Japan Reacts
AnimeJapan Reacts editorsYouTube

The Elusive Samurai: Matsui Yusei Bought a 670-Year-Old Document to Change the Finale

逃げ若の作者、自腹で670年前の古文書を購入し最終巻のラストを変更

The Elusive Samurai: Matsui Yusei Bought a 670-Year-Old Document to Change the Finale

The Elusive Samurai creator Matsui Yusei personally bought a newly surfaced historical document, roughly 670 years old — and its contents are changing how the manga's final volume ends compared to the version that already ran in Weekly Shonen Jump.

Across the video collecting Japan's reaction to the news (137 comments total), the top-liked comment (1,263 likes) marveled that a creator who's had three straight series adapted into anime still throws himself into research this deep, while another highly-liked comment (889 likes) pointed out that the magazine issue carrying the original ending just became a must-keep collector's item. Commenters compared Matsui to Kishibe Rohan, the obsessive-researcher mangaka from JoJo's Bizarre Adventure, and split over what the newly found letter actually reveals about the manga's side character Inotsurumaru.

This titleJapanese reactions to The Elusive SamuraiRead all 4 roundups on the title page
(YouTube · いま超話題の反応集)

The Elusive Samurai creator Matsui Yusei personally bought a newly surfaced historical document, roughly 670 years old, and its contents are changing how the manga's final volume ends compared to the version that already ran in Weekly Shonen Jump. A Japanese reaction-compilation video built around the news pulled in 137 comments, most of them stunned that a mangaka would go this far, right as the series itself was wrapping up its run.

“This guy's got the research drive of Kishibe Rohan.”

岸辺露伴みたいな取材意欲しやがって

— @ponytail41496 likes
“I figured he was just a genius since he's had three series in a row adapted into anime since his debut, but he's got enough passion to make you think, "of course this guy succeeds."”

デビューから3作連続でアニメ化しているからただの天才漫画家だと思っていたけど、成功して当然だと思わせられるくらいの熱意があるわ

— @てっけてけてってけて1,263 likes

According to the comments, the document was headed for being broken apart and sold off piece by piece to collectors — a more profitable route for whoever held it — until Matsui was asked to buy it whole instead. He did. Because the find came after the magazine serialization had already printed its final chapter, the ending going into the collected tankobon volume won't match the one readers already saw in that issue of Weekly Shonen Jump. Several commenters also brought up that Matsui had said from the start of the series that he saw it as paying back a debt he owed to Weekly Shonen Jump itself, and read this purchase as him following through on that all the way to the very end.

“It would've made more money to break the document apart and sell it piece by piece. Before that could happen, someone actually asked him, "could you buy the whole thing as a set instead?" That's how the purchase happened.”

資料はバラシて売る方が儲かるから、バラ売りされそうだったのを そうなる前に先生まとめて買ってくれませんか?ってお願いされての購入だぞ

— @七味-j3l845 likes
“If the ending is changing, that means the magazine issue with the original final chapter is now something you have to hang on to.”

ラストが変わるということは、最終話の載ってる本誌は保存必須という事だな。

— @酒蒸889 likes

Most of the thread isn't actually about the plot change, though — it's about what spending the money says about Matsui. Several commenters pushed back hard on the idea that this was some kind of publicity stunt, framing it instead as proof he's past caring about sales math.

“He's not the kind of mangaka who still has to do sales math like that. He spent the money so the ending could be the one he's most satisfied with, no regrets. You can't do that unless you genuinely love drawing manga.”

売り上げだとかそんな金勘定しなきゃいけないレベルの漫画家じゃないでしょ。最後に自分が最も納得がいって、悔いのない締めにするために金を出したんでしょう。漫画描くのが好きじゃないと無理だね

— @止まるんじゃねぇぞ-j7r497 likes
“People saying the author's just doing this for internet clout, or promotion, or fan service — I'm not even trying to dunk on them, that's just sad.”

作者がネット受け狙いとか宣伝とかサービスとか言っている人達、煽りで無く憐れだな。

— @mck603363 likes
“Working from real history as your theme and still keeping this much of your own flavor without breaking the story's flow — that's a rare kind of mangaka.”

史実をテーマにしてよくここまで流れを崩さずに色を出せるよな。稀有な漫画家すぎる。

— @サクラ-w6z361 likes

One highly-liked reply pushed back on the idea that a 670-year-old document turning up "now" should be surprising at all, laying out why these things keep surfacing centuries later.

“It's natural to think, "why is a document only showing up now," but most surviving documents from Japanese history were gathered by specifically targeting places like castles and temples. Records still sitting in old village-headman or local-official households — random copied manuscripts, personal diaries — are basically untouched, so there's still plenty that could get reconfirmed once enough fragments come together. Give it another hundred years, and if enough documents from the Nanboku-cho period turn up, even The Elusive Samurai or Bandit could end up looking like an outdated interpretation.”

「今になって古文書なんて…」と思われるのも当然だけど、日本史資料として現存してる古文書のほとんどは城や寺社仏閣といった施設に目星を付けて集めてきたもの もと庄屋・名主といった個人宅所蔵の資料、なにかの写本やら個人の日記やらはまだまだ手つかずと言っていい状態なので、断片的な資料が複数集まれば再確認できることはまだまだあると思う あと100年もして、南北朝時代にまつわる資料がいくつも出てきたら、『逃げ若』や『バンデット』ですら古い解釈になるのかも知れない

— @宮池純一299 likes

Not everyone agreed on what the letter actually proves about Inotsurumaru, the manga's side character tied to the find. One read said it confirms the manga got him right all along; another said it does the opposite, overturning how he'd been drawn.

“They found a letter from Inotsurumaru, and once it was deciphered, his personality basically matched how the manga already portrayed him, lol.”

命鶴丸の手紙が見つかって、解読した結果人物像が漫画内の描写とほぼ一緒ってのがねw

— @スネイクライフ205 likes
“They didn't change the ending around Tokiyuki himself, but it's great that we now know Inotsurumaru — who'd been drawn as incompetent — actually wasn't like that at all, and was more of a capable, hard-working guy.”

時行周りのラストは変えてないけど、無能な描かれ方してた命鶴丸が別にそういうことはなくどちらかというと有能かつ苦労人であったことが分かったのは良かったね

— @MrFortissalvare9317 likes

By the end, the thread had mostly given up trying to process it and settled into awe instead.

“Who even is this guy, lol.”

この人一体何者wwww

— @ほしちゃん-c9i102 likes
“A monster who's landed three hits in Jump and gotten every single one of them an anime.”

ジャンプで3作ヒットさせて全部アニメ化もした怪物

— @kenken424440 likes
“Hard to believe, right? This manga has this much actual historical pedigree behind it, and it's still got a dumb 4-panel gag strip running.”

信じられないだろ?この漫画こんなに由緒正しいのに4Pしてるんだぜ?

— @まるごん-e4n2 likes

That's about where the fandom landed: somewhere between awed and a little delirious, and still finding room to laugh at the gap between a document old enough to predate the printing press and a manga that never stopped being goofy about it.

FAQ

What did Elusive Samurai creator Matsui Yusei actually buy?
Commenters said Matsui personally purchased a roughly 670-year-old historical document out of his own pocket, after being asked to buy it as a complete set rather than let it be broken up and sold off piece by piece to collectors.
Will the manga's ending in the collected volume differ from the magazine version?
Yes — commenters said that because the document surfaced after the final chapter had already run in Weekly Shonen Jump, the ending going into the collected tankobon volume will differ from the one printed in the magazine, making that magazine issue a now sought-after collector's item.
What other manga has Matsui Yusei created?
Commenters identified Matsui as the creator of three straight manga that each got an anime adaptation, naming Assassination Classroom and Neuro: Supernatural Detective alongside The Elusive Samurai.
Read next · The Elusive Samurai

The Elusive Samurai Season 2: Three Gruff Generals Cover the Heroine's Love Song

“I was the vocal director on this?!?!?!?!?!?!”

Read this roundup

This is one of 4 Japanese-reaction roundups for The Elusive Samurai. See them all →

More from Japan