Japan Reacts

AnimeYouTube

Dragon Ball Super: Beerus Fans Defend a Triangle-Shaped Eye Shadow Overseas Viewers Mocked

ドラゴンボール超ビルス、目の下の三角形の影に海外から指摘が入り日本のファンが擁護論争

Source: YouTube10 of 161 comments translatedOriginal text alongsideJapan Reacts editors

【悲報】ドラゴンボール超ビルスの目の下のとある書き方が海外で叩かれてしまうwYouTube · セルの反応集

A Japanese reaction-compilation channel posted a clip this week spotlighting a small drawing choice in the Dragon Ball Super: Beerus remake -- a dark triangular shadow under Beerus's eye -- framing it as a detail that overseas viewers have apparently been mocking, then opened its own Japanese comment section to see whether the shading actually looks off.

The clip (posted October 21) drew 161 comments and 1,554 likes, split between commenters insisting the triangle is just long-running Dragon Ball shorthand for facial shadow and others admitting it has curdled into an over-stylized tic over the years.

By the end, though, the sharpest comments aren't really about the drawing at all -- they're about the people pausing the frame to find it.

This titleJapanese reactions to Dragon BallRead all 5 roundups on the title page

A Japanese reaction-compilation channel posted a clip this week zeroing in on one small drawing choice in the new Dragon Ball Super: Beerus remake: a dark, angular shadow drawn under Beerus's eye. The channel framed the detail as something overseas viewers have reportedly been criticizing, then threw it open to its own Japanese audience to settle whether the shading actually looks wrong. The resulting 161-comment thread turned into less of a verdict on the drawing and more of a referendum on who's actually watching this closely in the first place, with replies splitting into camps that defend the shadow as deliberate style, admit it's drifted into habit, or dismiss the whole premise as nitpicking a remake that was only ever promising cleaner art, not a frame-by-frame redesign.

@gajajtm359 likes
We already know the story, and I get that redoing the animation is the whole point here, but you're all watching way too closely just for the art. Are you actually enjoying it watching it like that? You're just hunting for something to complain about.

知ってるストーリーだし、作画やり直しを目的としてるのはわかるんだけど作画ばっか見すぎだろ 本当に楽しいのかよその見方 ケチつけるとこ探ってるだけやん

That's the top-voted take in the thread, and plenty of replies ran with it -- that scrutinizing one shadow this hard misses the point of a remake whose whole pitch is cleaner art, not a line-for-line audit of every frame. But a smaller, more technical camp jumped in to argue the triangle isn't actually a mistake, pointing to how light and shadow behave on an actual human face.

@ディ王_D王70 likes
As long as it's faithful to Toriyama's original style, I'm fine with whatever.

鳥山準拠ならなんでもいいと思ってる

@ch.62419 likes
If you actually look at photo books of models shot under strong, high-contrast lighting, people with deep-set features or a high nose bridge genuinely do get a shadow shaped like that. I love this triangle 😳

実際光が強かったり陰影がはっきりしてるモデルの写真集とかみてもらったらわかるけど堀が深い人や鼻が高い人にはほんとにこういう影があるのよ。僕はこの三角形大好き😳

A second camp agreed the shadow itself is real, but argued it's drifted from a reasoned drawing choice into pure muscle-memory habit -- a shorthand repeated so often by one particular animator that it no longer reads as a shadow at all, just a signature mark.

@みね-t9q0 likes
Yeah, it has genuinely turned into more of a symbol than a shadow at this point. Started as shading with a real logic behind it, then it just became a habitual tic -- kind of like Ran-neechan's horn.

まあ確かに記号になりすぎてる感はあるな。最初は理屈のある陰影だったのが手癖になって、みたいな。蘭ねーちゃんの角みたいに

@yfyb0 likes
That triangle is seriously just Yamamuro's own personal habit at this point, his own interpretation. I don't think anyone even registers it as a shadow anymore.

この三角はマジで山室の勝手な手癖、解釈だからな これが影っていう認識がもう無くなっちゃってるんやろうな

@キャンドル-u2k14 likes
The animation feels so much like a "digital Yamamuro edition" at this point -- I get that it's clean, but I think it could look cooler than this.

作画がデジタル山室エディションすぎて、綺麗なのはわかるんだけど、もっとカッコよくできるやろとは思う

There's also a context-setting voice reminding everyone this isn't new territory for the franchise.

@yousuke1721 likes
Honestly, Dragon Ball's had art-style arguments like the old "Uchiyama animation controversy" for ages, so this just feels like business as usual.

正味作画については昔から「内山作画論争」とか死ぬほどやってたから、 まぁいつも通りという感じ

From there the thread drifts away from the drawing itself and toward the culture of combing frame-by-frame for things to complain about, with one reply tying the whole premise -- that this is an "overseas" complaint at all -- back to the same nitpicking habit.

@VoxAC-yh1ux0 likes
Honestly, Japanese social media should just shut itself off from the rest of the world. We really don't mesh.

まじで日本のSNSは鎖国していいと思う。やっぱ相容れないよ

@須藤マック2 likes
Are you seriously pausing it that much just to watch? lol

そこまでホイホイ止めて観るの?w

The thread's closing line doesn't try to settle the art debate at all -- it just points out who's doing the analyzing.

@papipir83290 likes
Dragon Ball viewers sure have a lot of art-teacher types among them. Did you trace it into your sketchbook or something? (baby voice)

ドラゴンボールの視聴者は専門家の先生が多いね。 じゆうちょうに模写でもしたんでちゅかね?

Eleven days into the Beerus remake, the thread never actually lands on whether the triangle is good art, bad habit, or nothing at all -- it just confirms that whichever side wins, somebody's pausing the frame to keep arguing about it.

Read next · Dragon Ball

Dragon Ball Super: Beerus Remake Fans Argue the Rough 2015 Hit-Reaction Face Was Better

Turns out a little bit of "bad" animation can actually have more character.

Read this roundup

FAQ

What's the eye-shading controversy around Dragon Ball Super: Beerus?
A Japanese reaction-compilation channel posted a clip framing a small dark triangular shadow under Beerus's eye, in the 2026 Beerus remake, as a detail overseas viewers have reportedly been criticizing. The channel's Japanese comment section then argued over whether the shading is a deliberate, long-running Dragon Ball drawing convention or an over-stylized habit that's drifted away from its original logic.
Do the Japanese commenters agree the shading looks wrong?
Opinion splits three ways: some argue the triangular shadow is realistic for a face with deep-set eyes and high cheekbones, others say it's become a pure stylistic tic repeated out of habit rather than reasoned shading, and a third group -- including the most-liked comment -- argues the whole debate is just nitpicking a remake whose point was always a visual refresh, not a shot-by-shot redesign.

This is one of 5 Japanese-reaction roundups for Dragon Ball. See them all

Other write-ups where the talk was about craft and music

How we classify this (rankings)

More from Japan